Friday, January 23, 2009

Great inauguration photo

This is an absolutely incredible photo of the inauguration. Photographer David Bergman has created a composite panoramic image of the event from over 200 stills with a total resolution of 1474 megapixels.

The detail is incredible, and the longer you look the more cool things you can see, including:
  • Yo-Yo Ma snapping a photo on his iPhone -- in about the fourth row on the balcony one level above and behind Obama, right in the middle
  • Clarence Thomas catching some Zs -- with the rest of the Court, immediately to the President's left, second row
  • An impressive array of porta-potties -- in the background behind the media tower, middle-right
  • Aretha Franklin's hat -- essentially indescribable. On the (stage) left side of the middle section behind Obama, sixth row
And then there are questions I don't yet know the answer to. For example, who is the guy sitting in front of the Chief Justice? Who are the people in the left-most window on the top floor of the west wing of the Rayburn House Office Building?

The person I'd really like to identify, though, is sitting directly between Bill Clinton and Al Gore. Bill and Hillary are sitting with the former presidents and their spouses -- George H.W. and Barbara Bush, and Jimmy and Rosalynn Carter. Al and Tipper Gore are sitting with the former VPs and spouses -- Dan and Marilyn Quayle, Walter Mondale and his wife (name?). So who gets seated between the former presidents and former vice presidents? My best guess, based on this list of the order of precedence, is that they're ambassadors. Can anyone identify them?

Tuesday, January 20, 2009

What would the Jeffersonian Republicans think?

Was anyone else disappointed to see Chief Justice Roberts add "so help you/me God" to the end of the oath today? The words are not, of course, in the text of Article II. I thought this guy was a strict constructionist.

And don't even get me started on how he transposed the "faithfully."

Sunday, January 18, 2009

And now for something completely different

Ever run around with pumpkins on your heads? I recommend it.

Note that this post does not get the "drinking" tag.

Monday, January 12, 2009

Holy cow, that looks like a baby!

Fortunately for everyone, the child does not take after its father.

Monday, January 05, 2009

On the Browns coaching search and Eric Mangini

In the very near future, the Browns will interview Ravens Director of Pro Personnel George Kokinis for their vacant GM position. Kokinis was not on the Browns' radar until Eric Mangini identified Kokinis as Mangini's preferred GM candidate. The obvious implication of this interview is that the Browns anticipate hiring Mangini to be their head coach. I'm not really on board with this, and I'd like to make the case that it's better to hire a top assistant than someone who was just fired by another team.

To be fair, I don't think Mangini is a bad coach. I think he's at least as qualified as the average NFL head coach, and maybe he's even a little bit better. I only saw him actively mess up game management once (week 16 this year at Seattle). He seems to be a non-nonsense guy who doesn't play favorites. But his record also seems to be pretty closely tied to personnel changes (i.e., it's not clear that he's making the sum greater than its parts), and he's a member of the Belichick coaching tree, whose members are 71-90 as NFL head coaches. Plus, the thought of going with another former Belichick defensive coordinator as head coach (like Romeo Crennel) and another Ravens personnel guy as GM (like Phil Savage) has me feeling a little nauseous.

So I asked my friend Tim to talk me down off the ledge. Here was his resposne:

Here's the deal, of all available coaching candidates, we have ruled out college coaches (see Butch Davis) and hot NFL coordinators (see Romeo Crennel). That being said we are looking at retreads. I think Cowher is out of play this season, which leaves the most attractive candidates as Schottenheimer, Shanahan and Mangini. Schott doesn't even appear to be an option, I think he might really be retired (he hasn't been mentioned anywhere). Shanahan is on vacation and won't interview anywhere for the next couple of weeks. Lerner may wait for him to see where he stands but the guy has had total control in Denver for a while and he hasn't won a thing without John Elway. I don't think he is the slam dunk everyone is making him out to be. Which leads us to Mangini, a guy who has had two winning seasons in his first three years as a head coach.
That got me to thinking. Unless an NFL owner intends to hire someone straight out of high school or the arena league, or someone who has never coached football at all before, then there are only three types of NFL head coaches, and Tim mentioned them all -- college head coaches, NFL assistants, and retreads. To categorically exclude two of the three strikes me as more than a little foolish.

Let's start with college head coaches. Only three current NFL head coaches were college head coaches -- Tony Sparano (New Haven (D-II), 1994-1999), Tom Cable (Idaho State, 2000-2003), and Tom Coughlin (Boston College, 1991-1993). Sparano and Cable spent significant a significant amount of time as NFL assistants following their departure from the college ranks. Coughlin went directly from BC to Jacksonville, where he coached for eight seasons, and then was out of football for one year before taking over the Giants. Based on this, it seems like a case could be made for staying away from college coaches. Sparano and Coughlin have had success, but Sparano was nearly a decade removed from his college job, and Coughlin was in a unique situation when he took over the expansion Jaguars. Cable is an interim this year, and perhaps shouldn't be in this discussion at all.

That leaves us with NFL assistants and, as Tim called them, NFL retreads. I have compiled some numbers on the retreads' records. Click on the picture below for a better look.

There are nine current retreads: Coughlin, Belichick, Dick Jauron, Wade Phillips, Tony Dungy, Jon Gruden, Herm Edwards, Norv Turner, and Jim Haslett. (Although Haslett is an interim, I've included him because he coached more than half of his team's games this year.) Phillips and Turner are on their third teams with full-time gigs. I did not include their interim terms because they were five games or less.

In their first stops as NFL head coaches, these guys were a combined 380-394, a .497 winning percentage. In their subsequent posts (i.e., including Phillips and Turner's third teams as well as everyone's second), they were a combined 408-292, a .583 winning percentage.

But wait a tick. Belichick and Dungy have been absolutely phenomenal in their second go-rounds as head coaches, combining for a 187-69 record, or .730 winning percentage, during their time with the Patriots and Colts. If you take these guys out of the equation, the group of retreads is 221-223 after their first jobs, a .498 winning percentage, almost exactly the same as the win rate for their first jobs. (To be fair, taking Belichick and Dungy out of the tally for first jobs lowers that winning percentage to .493, which means the other seven guys increased their win percentage by .005, an average of one additional win every 12.5 seasons.)

Looking at individual changes, besides Belichick and Dungy only Wade Phillips saw a large uptick in his winning percentage after his first job. Oddly enough, some people think Phillips may still lose his job before next year, and I think I'd get laughed out of town of I suggested that the Browns hire Phillips.

Here are the final breakdowns in terms of increased wins or losses for coaches after their first job:

Belichick - Extra 4.1 wins per season
Dungy - Extra 3.1 wins per season
Phillips - Extra 2.2 wins per season
Coughlin - Extra 0.9 wins per season
Jauron - No change
Turner - Extra 0.25 losses per sesaon
Gruden - Extra 1.3 losses per season
Edwards - Extra 2.8 losses per season
Haslett - Extra 4.8 losses per season

Average for everyone - Extra 1.4 wins per season

Average for everyone not named Belichick or Dungy - Extra 0.07 wins per season, or about one win every 12.5 years.

The point is this: with only Belichick and Dungy as exceptions, coaches in their next job perform at about the rate as they did in their first job. Mangini averaged just under eight wins a year. The Browns are in a division where everything Pittsburgh or Baltimore touches turns to gold. Eight wins a year, with a ninth win in 2021, isn't going to cut it.

By going with Mangini, Randy Lerner is betting that he's the next Belichick or Dungy, rather than the next everyone else. I hope to hell he's right, but I kind of doubt it.

Friday, January 02, 2009

TV complaint

I am one of those poor suckers who does not have an HDTV yet. My four and a half year old low-def TV is not a widescreen like all the newer TVs. This means that when things happen on the edges of the screen, I don't see them.

Normally this is not a problem. I don't watch a lot of TV shows, but what I do watch is formatted appropriately for my TV. When it comes to watching sports, CBS producers do a good job of keeping the action in the middle of the screen where I can see it. (I am a Browns fan; almost all of their games are on CBS. For college football, ABC and ESPN producers are equally competent.)

But Fox producers are terrible at this. I rarely watch the NFL on Fox, so I haven't noticed this until bowl season. All three games Fox has shown so far have a ton of action happening with only half of it on my screen, or sometimes off it entirely (for example, the sack that ended the first quarter in the Sugar Bowl? I could barely tell what was happening).

This is just another reason why the BCS stinks. There are many others, of course, but nobody is talking about how the BCS sold the TV deal to a network that doesn't produce a single college football game all year until it's time for the most important ones. (And while we're at it, we should mention that Fox then went and staffed those games with announcing teams that aren't any good either.) I am no fan of ESPN, but it will be a welcome change when the BCS games move there in a few years.