Tuesday, February 23, 2010
Saturday, July 18, 2009
So you can imagine how thrilled I was a few days ago after I had just changed a diaper and was about to leave for work, when I discovered that some deer had passed through our yard the night before, and one of our dogs took it upon herself to roll in their poop. Life is good.
By the way -- this post? Coming to you live from the bathroom!
Saturday, June 27, 2009
Thursday, May 07, 2009
Tuesday, April 07, 2009
got passed around from person to person for no apparent reason, and eventually I was placed on hold.
The hold music? "Runaround," by Blues Traveler.
Monday, March 02, 2009
Tuesday, February 03, 2009
While I certainly agree with him in principle, I think he overdoes it a little bit with the details. His version of the list the teenager gives to her mom is as follows:
In this scenario, the teenager is attempting to con her mom into spending $2904 to "fix her car," when in reality only $1575 of that is necessary. The remaining $1329, or about 45%, is her "wish list."
- Engine: $1,140
- Brakes: $155
- Tires: $280
- New Dress: $70
- Nintendo Wii: $250
- Four Wine Glasses: $44
- HDTV for my Room: $880
- Ceramic Flat Hair Iron: $85
I am not an expert on what's in the bill that's being debated right now, but CNN.com has a list of items apparently identified by Republican leaders as "wasteful." The trouble is that those items total "only" about $19.1 billion in a package with a total cost of nearly $900 billion. Even assuming the package was only $800 billion, the wasteful spending identified is only about 2.4% of the total.
Put another way, if the teenager's total bill was still $2904, the "wish list" items would cost less than $70.
To be perfectly clear, I still think the whole thing's a load of crap. I just think a little perspective is in order.
Friday, January 23, 2009
The detail is incredible, and the longer you look the more cool things you can see, including:
- Yo-Yo Ma snapping a photo on his iPhone -- in about the fourth row on the balcony one level above and behind Obama, right in the middle
- Clarence Thomas catching some Zs -- with the rest of the Court, immediately to the President's left, second row
- An impressive array of porta-potties -- in the background behind the media tower, middle-right
- Aretha Franklin's hat -- essentially indescribable. On the (stage) left side of the middle section behind Obama, sixth row
The person I'd really like to identify, though, is sitting directly between Bill Clinton and Al Gore. Bill and Hillary are sitting with the former presidents and their spouses -- George H.W. and Barbara Bush, and Jimmy and Rosalynn Carter. Al and Tipper Gore are sitting with the former VPs and spouses -- Dan and Marilyn Quayle, Walter Mondale and his wife (name?). So who gets seated between the former presidents and former vice presidents? My best guess, based on this list of the order of precedence, is that they're ambassadors. Can anyone identify them?
Tuesday, January 20, 2009
And don't even get me started on how he transposed the "faithfully."
Sunday, January 18, 2009
Monday, January 12, 2009
Monday, January 05, 2009
To be fair, I don't think Mangini is a bad coach. I think he's at least as qualified as the average NFL head coach, and maybe he's even a little bit better. I only saw him actively mess up game management once (week 16 this year at Seattle). He seems to be a non-nonsense guy who doesn't play favorites. But his record also seems to be pretty closely tied to personnel changes (i.e., it's not clear that he's making the sum greater than its parts), and he's a member of the Belichick coaching tree, whose members are 71-90 as NFL head coaches. Plus, the thought of going with another former Belichick defensive coordinator as head coach (like Romeo Crennel) and another Ravens personnel guy as GM (like Phil Savage) has me feeling a little nauseous.
So I asked my friend Tim to talk me down off the ledge. Here was his resposne:
Here's the deal, of all available coaching candidates, we have ruled out college coaches (see Butch Davis) and hot NFL coordinators (see Romeo Crennel). That being said we are looking at retreads. I think Cowher is out of play this season, which leaves the most attractive candidates as Schottenheimer, Shanahan and Mangini. Schott doesn't even appear to be an option, I think he might really be retired (he hasn't been mentioned anywhere). Shanahan is on vacation and won't interview anywhere for the next couple of weeks. Lerner may wait for him to see where he stands but the guy has had total control in Denver for a while and he hasn't won a thing without John Elway. I don't think he is the slam dunk everyone is making him out to be. Which leads us to Mangini, a guy who has had two winning seasons in his first three years as a head coach.That got me to thinking. Unless an NFL owner intends to hire someone straight out of high school or the arena league, or someone who has never coached football at all before, then there are only three types of NFL head coaches, and Tim mentioned them all -- college head coaches, NFL assistants, and retreads. To categorically exclude two of the three strikes me as more than a little foolish.
Let's start with college head coaches. Only three current NFL head coaches were college head coaches -- Tony Sparano (New Haven (D-II), 1994-1999), Tom Cable (Idaho State, 2000-2003), and Tom Coughlin (Boston College, 1991-1993). Sparano and Cable spent significant a significant amount of time as NFL assistants following their departure from the college ranks. Coughlin went directly from BC to Jacksonville, where he coached for eight seasons, and then was out of football for one year before taking over the Giants. Based on this, it seems like a case could be made for staying away from college coaches. Sparano and Coughlin have had success, but Sparano was nearly a decade removed from his college job, and Coughlin was in a unique situation when he took over the expansion Jaguars. Cable is an interim this year, and perhaps shouldn't be in this discussion at all.
That leaves us with NFL assistants and, as Tim called them, NFL retreads. I have compiled some numbers on the retreads' records. Click on the picture below for a better look.
There are nine current retreads: Coughlin, Belichick, Dick Jauron, Wade Phillips, Tony Dungy, Jon Gruden, Herm Edwards, Norv Turner, and Jim Haslett. (Although Haslett is an interim, I've included him because he coached more than half of his team's games this year.) Phillips and Turner are on their third teams with full-time gigs. I did not include their interim terms because they were five games or less.
In their first stops as NFL head coaches, these guys were a combined 380-394, a .497 winning percentage. In their subsequent posts (i.e., including Phillips and Turner's third teams as well as everyone's second), they were a combined 408-292, a .583 winning percentage.
But wait a tick. Belichick and Dungy have been absolutely phenomenal in their second go-rounds as head coaches, combining for a 187-69 record, or .730 winning percentage, during their time with the Patriots and Colts. If you take these guys out of the equation, the group of retreads is 221-223 after their first jobs, a .498 winning percentage, almost exactly the same as the win rate for their first jobs. (To be fair, taking Belichick and Dungy out of the tally for first jobs lowers that winning percentage to .493, which means the other seven guys increased their win percentage by .005, an average of one additional win every 12.5 seasons.)
Looking at individual changes, besides Belichick and Dungy only Wade Phillips saw a large uptick in his winning percentage after his first job. Oddly enough, some people think Phillips may still lose his job before next year, and I think I'd get laughed out of town of I suggested that the Browns hire Phillips.
Here are the final breakdowns in terms of increased wins or losses for coaches after their first job:
Belichick - Extra 4.1 wins per season
Dungy - Extra 3.1 wins per season
Phillips - Extra 2.2 wins per season
Coughlin - Extra 0.9 wins per season
Jauron - No change
Turner - Extra 0.25 losses per sesaon
Gruden - Extra 1.3 losses per season
Edwards - Extra 2.8 losses per season
Haslett - Extra 4.8 losses per season
Average for everyone - Extra 1.4 wins per season
Average for everyone not named Belichick or Dungy - Extra 0.07 wins per season, or about one win every 12.5 years.
The point is this: with only Belichick and Dungy as exceptions, coaches in their next job perform at about the rate as they did in their first job. Mangini averaged just under eight wins a year. The Browns are in a division where everything Pittsburgh or Baltimore touches turns to gold. Eight wins a year, with a ninth win in 2021, isn't going to cut it.
By going with Mangini, Randy Lerner is betting that he's the next Belichick or Dungy, rather than the next everyone else. I hope to hell he's right, but I kind of doubt it.